[(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm 36 0 Td [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ /Adieresis /Aring /AE /Ccedilla /Egrave /Eacute /Ecircumflex /Edieresis /Igrave /Iacute regarding requests for production of documents. [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ endobj Subject to the above objections, Plaintiff has no responsive documents in its possession, custody, or control, other than those that have already been produced to Defendant and those being produced as verbatim statements of a third party in response to Request No. /TT1 12 Tf 19 0 obj >> (15)Tj /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/litigation/committees/pretrial-practice-discovery/practice/2017/how-to-make-good-objections-to-written-discovery, Make it a lead-off general objection.. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3); Hickman v. Taylor 329 U.S. 495 (1947). Copyright 2017, American Bar Association. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.5065 86.2909 Tm (25)Tj Software. 0 -791.16 l << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.6004 679.0819 Tm 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 1 g -44.76 -24 Td All such documents and information will not be produced. q T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] THIRD: "Relevant non-privileged and non-protected documents". (24)Tj (19)Tj 48 0 obj -310.67 -24 Td Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. (21)Tj (6. x%0>7P{o2:Krc\_xJ5= +\n"bL}';.b.5|4}bHXVvK! /Contents [76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R] The district court where compliance is required has jurisdiction to resolve objections. \()3.1 (MON)2.8 (G)-8.7 (L)11.7 (Y)1.2 (04269006-)3 (07)-9.1 (\))2.9 ( [)-7.8 (Th)1.8 (is)-2.9 ( R)-2.2 (e)3 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9.9 (t)-1.9 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (l)6 (is)-3 (t)-2 (e)3 (d a)4 (s )8.1 (N)2 (o. DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONSWhat is Wrong with this Document Response? 2030.060(d). The propounding party had placed the definitions of specific terms in a preamble. (3)Tj 20 0 obj /DA (/Helv 0 Tf 0 g ) ( )Tj /ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. )25.903 (1)]TJ /Rotate 0 Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 was not an investigation, it was a document request. Without waiving, responding party states that all responsive, unprivileged, known, and reasonably available documents will be produced by Defendant, if they have not already been produced to Plaintiffs. 0.71 0 l GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Dl'|hI;%C^FqT%hE3V*S:.1~~K~|b\?q,E+9N0pg >> EMC (13)Tj Consequently, there are no individuals and entities who were interviewed by the DOJ pursuant to its "CID" investigation of Dentsply. (28)Tj [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter." T* 65.4 648.61 Td )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ Biles v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2004) 124 CA 4th 1315. Further, Plaintiff makes the responses and objections herein without in any way implying that it considers the requests and interrogatory, and responses to the requests and interrogatory, to be relevant or material to the subject matter of this action. /Rotate 0 T* [(f)3 (or)3 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (hi)-2 (s t)-2.3 (i)-2 (t)-2.8 (l)-2 (e)4.7 (\224)4 ( w)1.1 (hich inc)3 (l)-1.9 (ude)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( r)3.8 (e)3.2 (qu)-10 (e)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s )-2 (f)2.7 (or)3 ( a)3.1 (dmi)-4 (s)-11.8 (si)-2.4 (on\))2.1 (;)-1.1 ( C)-3 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (. -103.32 -24 Td 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. Service Provider. (11)Tj Nail Down Whether the Documents You are Seeking ever Existed and Where They are Now, A Needle in a Haystack When Opposing Party Dumps Documents. T* At the same time, the court pointed out that the rules and decisions requiring specificity have been published for years. (NRCP 36; JCRCP 36.) (8)Tj T* 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ << /ZaDb 41 0 R /TT1 12 Tf :)13 ( )-1530 (O)-1.1 (N)1.1 (E)-2.1 ( )]TJ /Contents [96 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R] 2. W n (2)Tj (8)Tj /quotesingle 96 /grave 128 /bullet /dagger /daggerdbl /ellipsis /emdash /endash endobj /Rotate 0 /degree /plusminus /twosuperior /threesuperior /acute /mu 183 /periodcentered /cedilla /onesuperior T* Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. Documents already produced will not be produced again. W n >> )Tj >> BT A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. endobj T* /TT0 12 Tf m)-2 (a)4 (l)-2 (e)4.8 ( )]TJ f (16)Tj In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. T* /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] BT /TT1 12 Tf endstream T* (12)Tj BT f /ExtGState 127 0 R >> 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. << [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (D)2.9 (I)-1.7 (N)-7.2 (G)7.1 ( )-9.1 (P)10.9 (A)2 (R)2 (T)-12.9 (Y)1.1 (:)-6.1 ( )-1050.8 (D)1.9 (e)4 (f)-6.9 (e)3.9 (n)-3.9 (d)-3.2 (an)-4.8 (t)3.7 ( M)4 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (A)1.9 (N)2 (T)-2.9 (O)-2 ( C)1.9 (O)-1.9 (M)3.9 (PA)3.2 (N)2 (Y)2 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ 48 0 Td Q >> -6 -24 Td T* Has knowledge of safety measures, production processes and past industrial experience. T* [(3)6.8 (4)6.8 (8)21.806 (1)8.095 (2)6.899 (\\)23.898 (6)21.806 (2)6.899 (6)21.793 (1)5.604 (3)21.806 (8)6.8 (3)8.095 (. [(t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( st)-3.7 (a)4.7 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (s )-2 (m)-3.9 (a)4.8 (de)3.1 ( in)-2 ( t)-4 (he)3 ( c)4 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (e)3.9 (d )-9 (doc)3 (ument oc)3 (c)4.9 (ur)-7.8 (r)3 (e)4.8 (d on )]TJ q endobj While "CID" is defined in Definition No. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 37.07 0 Td (28)Tj /Encoding 17 0 R ( )Tj -103.32 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. Continue Reading DISCOVERY GAMES AND MISCONCEPTIONSWhat is Wrong with this Document Response? )]TJ [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-4.8 (e)4.8 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. This Request violates the Court's scheduling Orders because it seeks documents T* The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-12 (o )]TJ Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. T* /TT1 12 Tf )]TJ )9 ( )-989.9 ([)-6.1 (Th)1.8 (i)-1.9 (s )-182 (R)-3 (e)3.9 (q)10 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 ( )-199.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-191.1 (l)-2 (i)-2.9 (st)-4 (e)4 (d )-189.1 (a)3 (s )-200.9 (N)1.9 (o. Q 0 0 m << /Resources 75 0 R /Contents [88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R] endobj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm /TT0 9.96 Tf T* BT 30.72 0 Td [( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)4.9 (i)-1.9 (t)-2.9 (e)4.8 (d m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (or)2.9 (a)3.1 (nd)-9 (um)-2.9 ( da)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d 9/)-1.9 (4/)-2 (84 f)2.9 (r)2.2 (om)-1.1 ( )]TJ [(ON)-2.701 (S)-10.301 (A)10.1 (NT)-16.104 (O)-1.898 ( )-3.002 (C)5.201 (O)-1.797 (. (17)Tj /TT1 12 Tf Plaintiff objects to Definition No. )9.9 ( )]TJ [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ endobj (10)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.11554 36 cm /Length 131 0 R By RFP No. )]TJ T* 36 0 Td W n . << /Annots [] (7)Tj The statutes all contain the same language, but its not that easy to decipher. /Length 125 0 R T* Plaintiff will use the definitions of these terms found in Objections 3-4 in responding to this request. They produced redacted documents, no privilege log yet. << (26)Tj [(l)-1.1 (i)-2 (st)-4.9 (e)4.8 (d a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (No)2 (. 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re [(dupl)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3.1 (a)4 (t)-2 (i)-2 (ve)4 ( of)3.8 ( di)-2.8 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19.1 ( )-9.9 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (a)4.8 (d)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( p)-9.9 (e)3.1 (r)3 (m)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-1.2 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (d. )]TJ /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* Plaintiff objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." q SET NUMBER: ONE (1) To Plaintiff, Acme, Inc . -177.12 -24 Td [(Th)1.8 (e)4.9 (se)3.1 ( G)2 (e)3.2 (n)-10 (e)4.8 (r)3 (a)3.2 (l)-1.9 ( O)1.9 (bj)-12 (e)4.8 (c)3.2 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on)-10.9 (s a)2.8 (ppl)-12 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (o a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( of)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3 ( )-9.9 (f)3.8 (ol)-2.8 (l)-1.9 (ow)1.9 (i)-1.9 (ng)10.7 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.1 (spons)-1.5 (e)3.1 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.1 (o sp)-2 (e)-7.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.8 (i)-2 (c)3.9 ( )]TJ -73.07 -24 Td endobj >> endstream Q In its responses, the defendant asserted boilerplate objections. 38 0 obj Plaintiff objects to Instruction No. (24)Tj W n )Tj [(w)2 (hi)-2 (c)4 (h w)2 (e)4.8 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( su)-1.8 (bm)-4.7 (i)-2 (t)-2 (t)-1.1 (e)3 (d t)-1.9 (o r)3 (e)-5.1 (g)9.9 (ul)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (or)-17.9 (y)20.8 ( a)-6.8 (ge)4.8 (nc)3.1 (ies i)-3.5 (n t)-1.1 (h)-10.9 (e)3.9 ( U)2.9 (ni)-2.8 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (d S)-4.8 (t)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (a)3 (nd ot)-1.9 (he)3 (r)-6 ( c)3.9 (ount)-1.9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (M)-1.1 (onsa)1.1 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ /ExtGState 133 0 R f 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm /Length 149 0 R /TT0 12 Tf And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. /Length 130 0 R q (4. )]TJ q T* endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 27 0 obj [(2016.050 \()2.9 (\223)4.9 ([)-7.8 (s])-8.1 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on 1013 a)3 (ppl)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (t)-2 (o a)3.1 (n)-9.1 (y)19.9 ( m)-12.8 (e)4 (t)-1.9 (hod of)2.8 ( di)-1.9 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19 ( or)3 ( s)-10 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 (vic)-8 (e)3.9 ( of)-7.8 ( a)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (ot)-2.9 (i)-2 (on pr)3 (ovi)-2 (de)4.8 (d )]TJ endobj In addition, such materials often summarize the reasons the Division conducted the interview, characterize the importance of the information learned in the interview, draw inferences based on that information, describe the author's impressions concerning the cooperativeness, credibility, or knowledge of the interviewee, and/or identify potential areas of further inquiry. (1)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 527.1214635 755.2367083 cm 47.76 0 Td 36 -24 Td [(D)2 (i)-2 (vi)-1.1 (si)-4 (on c)3.9 (onc)3.1 (l)-1.9 (ude)3.9 (d t)-1.9 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( t)-2 (he)4.8 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (na)3.9 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.1 (e)3 ( )-9 (a)3.9 (de)3.2 (nom)-2 (a)4 (s)-10.1 ( f)2.9 (ound i)-1.9 (n t)-2.9 (he)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (d-)3.8 ( a)3.1 (nd hig)7.9 (h-)3 (dos)-11.8 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (g)9.1 (r)3.8 (oup )]TJ >> 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.8146786 -39.599996 cm /Annots [] DEFENDANT PAUL SAMPLE 'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS SET ONE of requesting party, and the set number. 106.32 0 Td (4)Tj 0.428 -431.088 l /OCProperties 2 0 R Promote the use of green energy by installing a solar system before completing the third phase of construction. EMC f [(a)4 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-2 (s )-2 (i)-2.1 (n st)-4 (ud)-10 (y)19 ( B)7.9 (D)-8.7 (N)1.9 (-)3.8 (7)-10.7 (7-)2.8 (420 a)5.3 (r)3 (e)3.1 ( )-9.8 (r)3.7 (a)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (. /TT0 12 Tf << (10)Tj ( )Tj T* /GS0 gs EMC /TT0 12 Tf q >> The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. T* q /Filter /FlateDecode /Encoding 39 0 R 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 272.03 586.67 139.8 -1.19 re ( )Tj /TT0 9.96 Tf [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (be)2.8 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (g)9.9 ( done)4 ( b)-10.7 (y)20.7 ( )-9.9 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o dur)2 (in)-12.8 (g)10.7 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( 1)-9.9 (991 t)-2 (hr)2.9 (oug)10 (h 2017 p)-9.9 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (i)-1.1 (od )-10.8 (i)-2 (nvol)-1.2 (vi)-2 (ng)9.1 ( a)4.8 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ /Names 3 0 R The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. 47.77 0 Td [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ This sample California request for production of documents is sent pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.010, et seq. Plaintiff objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files. endstream T* T* 5. Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, and notes of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. /Filter /FlateDecode Q 3 on the grounds that it is vague and ambiguous, that it calls for the production of documents that are irrelevant to this action and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, to the extent that it calls for the production of documents in the format as they may be maintained in files outside of the principal investigatory and case files. q Model objections to document requests, sometimes referred to as requests for production or RFPs, for an employer's counsel to use when responding to a plaintiff's document requests in a single plaintiff employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA .
What Is Martin O'malley Doing Now,
Ducktrap Salmon Expiration Date,
Articles S